You are browsing the archive for art.

Whither the art

November 20, 2012 in Comment, General

Whither the art - at school. Considered by UK @ procartoonists.org

© Bill Stott @ Procartoonists.org

Our wise old cartoonist Bill Stott contemplates the state of the, er, art.

Interesting discussion on the Radio 4 Andrew Marr slot (19 November 2012) all about arts, arts funding, art in schools, and the new National Curriculum, which doesn’t include art and design as a compulsory subject.

The artist Antony Gormley and others sang the praises, quite rightly, of all the craftspersons and technical experts who make artists’ work possible, but the bit which stuck with me was that fact above about the National Curriculum.

I know a bit about art education in secondary schools, having been a teacher in the past. Its standards and performance nationally are much like that of maths or biology. i.e. good, bad and indifferent.

However, it always struck me that decisions about what subjects should be taught were never the remit of art teachers. It was fine for a head teacher, or a head of curriculum as they became known (usually a deputy head) whose specialist subject was English or physics, to decide how many periods of maths, geography, history, science, languages, PE, RE and art etc, should be taught.

It was always taken as read that maths and English were the most important and I’ve no argument with that. What does make me wonder is the grasp, or lack of it, that these decision-makers have of good art teaching. My experience is: not a lot. When I was teaching art, there was still a deeply irritating belief, from those who didn’t teach it, that being good at and enjoying art was a “gift”– the stamping ground of the very few. Which is nonsense. Just as having a “gift” for geography is nonsense.

Bill Stott cartoon

© Bill Stott @ Procartoonists.org

OK, some kids are naturally able. But some kids are naturally able at PE, that doesn’t mean that all kids don’t get the opportunity.

So, given the new non-compulsory nature of art in schools, and the fact that curriculum decision-makers in schools were rubbish at art when they were at school, I fear that art may soon be relegated to after-school clubs. A pastime. How sad.

If you have something to say about BIll’s opinion please jump into the comments below.

Foghorn and the Big Society

October 4, 2012 in Comment, General

Our anthropomorphic Foghorn rallies with the Prime Minister.

Foghorn for September_29 @procartoonists.org

© Andy Davey @procartoonists.org

Foggy and the new rock n’ roll

September 27, 2012 in Comment, General

Foghorn September 22 @ procartoonists.org

© Andy Davey @ procartoonists.org

What Art thou Foggy?

September 21, 2012 in Comment, General

Foghorn September 15 @procartoonists.org

© Andy Davey @procartoonists.org

Our anthropomorphic Foghorn tackles the big question…

Beauty or bunk? The art of creativity

September 19, 2012 in Comment

Bill Stott art cartoon

© Bill Stott @ Procartoonists.org

Cartoonist and Procartoonists.org member Bill Stott talks creativity while trying to avoid the usual pitfalls

“Creativity is bunk” – I can’t remember where I read that, but it sort of lodged, because its bizarre. Not unlike Big Brother being classed as entertainment.

Maybe its one of the utterings of the great, good, and often dead. Like Henry Ford’s “History is bunk”. Mind you, historians tell us that he never actually said it. That’s a relief then. But somebody who might have said the one may have said the other.

And what’s “bunk” when it’s at home? Cowboys sleep on them, as do sailors, but such are the mysteries of the English language that “bunk” also means “nonsense” and, more recently, “boring”.

“Creativity is nonsense/boring”. Hmm. Should really define “creativity” first, I suppose. But I’ll neatly sidestep that by not doing so. Huge danger there, particularly for an artist, of falling into the head-up-arse artbollocks trap. Let’s leave that to the critics.

Bill Stott art cartoon

© Bill Stott @ Procartoonists.org

If Ford did say it, he was wrong. Without engineering creativity, he’d never have been able to churn out millions of black Model Ts (and they weren’t all black and he never said they had to be. Apparently). He surely didn’t think the millions he made out of bunk were boring.

Let’s face it, I’m avoiding the issue here. “Creativity is bunk” is aimed at we airy-fairy, arty types who dare to put substance to their imaginings. And I’m not at all sure that there are people who cannot appreciate beauty, or at least arresting physical fact. If there were, it wouldn’t have been necessary to invent things like “I don’t know much about Art but I know what I like”.

I have a neighbour who can’t tell a Rembrandt from a Bacon, but who waxes lyrical about the design of his golf clubs. He doesn’t make the link. But he does think they’re beautiful. Maybe the thing is that they are beautiful because they are things of purpose, like a beautiful car (not yours, Henry) or a beautiful greyhound. This last isn’t a good example because when greyhounds stop making money, they stop being desirably beautiful and become pet food.

Creativity, in all its artistic, technological and scientific forms is the antithesis of bunk. Creativity is asking questions about the nature of creation. Better go steady here – artbollocks looms – so let’s use mathematics as an example instead.

Maths is/are beautiful. There’s a logical symmetry there that is unbeatable. And if you’re bright enough to push the maths boat right out, it brushes aside logic, symmetry, and for us artproles, even understanding. No mathsbollocks there, just quantum mechanics.

Our thanks to Bill. You can see lots of examples of creativity in action if you check out his portfolio and many others here

Foggy and der yoof

September 14, 2012 in Comment, General, News

Our anthropomorphic friend launches himself upon the hard world of educashun.

Foghorn September 9th @ procartoonists.org

© Andy Davey @ procartoonists.org

Fog on the high ground

September 6, 2012 in Comment, General

In which our anthropomorphic Foghorn considers the horrors inherent in the role of the editorial or comment cartoonist.

Foghorn_on the High ground_August 25 @procartoonists.org

© Andy Davey @procartoonists.org

Foghorn and the silly season

August 30, 2012 in Comment, General

Our anthropomorphic chum considers the so-called silly season.

Foghorn and the the silly season_August 18 © Andy Davey @ procartoonists.org

© Andy Davey @ procartoonists.org

Foggy gets syndicated

August 23, 2012 in Comment, General

Foghorn_August 11© Andy Davey @ procartoonists.org

© Andy Davey @ procartoonists.org

Our anthropomorphic friend pleads on behalf of the UK’s manufacturers of off and on colour jokes.

Foghorn gets hip to the jive

August 23, 2012 in Comment, General

Foghorn_August 04 © Andy Davey @procartoonists.org

Foghorn_August 04 © Andy Davey @procartoonists.org

Foghorn acts as the anthropomorphic agent to the UK Professional Cartoonists’ Organisation and we, er, endorse this message.